- Blogs
- Discovery Lean Six Sigma
- How Can a Similar P-Value Mean Different Things?

One highlight of writing for and editing the Minitab Blog is the opportunity to read your responses and answer your questions. Sometimes, to my chagrin, you point out that we've made a mistake. However, I'm particularly grateful for those comments, because it permits us to correct inadvertent errors.

I feared I had an opportunity to fix just such an error when I saw this comment appear on one of our older blog posts:

*You said a p-value greater than 0.05 gives a good fit. However, in another post, you say the p-value should be below 0.05 if the result is significant. Please, check it out!*

You ever get a chill down your back when you realize you goofed? That's what I felt when I read that comment. *Oh no,* I thought. *If the p-value is greater than 0.05, the results of a test certainly wouldn't be significant. Did I overlook an error that basic? *

Before beating myself up about it, I decided to check out the posts in question. After reviewing them, I realized I wouldn't need to put on the hairshirt after all. But the question reminded me about the importance of a fundamental idea.

It Starts with the Hypothesis

If you took an introductory statistics course at some point, you probably recall the instructor telling the class how important it is to formulate your hypotheses clearly. *Excellent *advice.

However, many commonly used statistical tools formulate their hypotheses in ways that don't quite match. That's what this sharp-eyed commenter noticed and pointed out.

The writer of the first post detailed how to use Minitab to identify the distribution of your data, and in her example pointed out that a p-value greater than 0.05 meant that the data were a good fit for a given distribution. The writer of second post—yours truly—commented on the alarming tendency to use deceptive language to describe a high p-value as if it indicated statistical significance.

To put it in plain language, my colleague's post cited the high p-value as an indicator of a positive result. And my post chided people who cite a high p-value as an indicator of a positive result.

Now, what's so confusing about that?

Don't Forget What You're Actually Testing

You can see where this looks like a contradiction, but to my relief, the posts were consistent. The appearance of contradiction stemmed from the hypotheses discussed in the two posts. Let's take a look.

My colleague presented this graph, output from the Individual Distribution Identification:

The individual distribution identification is a kind of hypothesis test, and so the p-value helps you determine whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.

Here, the null hypothesis is "The data follow a normal distribution," and the alternative hypothesis would be "The data DO NOT follow a normal distribution." If the p-value is over 0.05, we will *fail to reject* the null hypothesis and conclude that the data follow the normal distribution.

Just have a look at that p-value:

*That's *a high p-value. And for this test, that means we can conclude the normal distribution fits the data. So if we're checking these data for the assumption of normality, this high p-value is good.

But more often we're looking for a low p-value. In a t-test, the null hypothesis might be "The sample means ARE NOT different," and the alternative hypothesis, "The sample means ARE different." Seen this way, the value or arrangement of the hypotheses is the opposite of that in the distribution identification.

Hence, the apparent contradiction. But in both cases a p-value greater than 0.05 means we fail to reject the null hypothesis. We're interpreting the p-value in each test the same way.

However, because the connotations of "good" and "bad" are different in the two examples, how we talk about these respective p-values appears contradictory—until we consider exactly what the null and alternative hypotheses are saying.

And that's a point I was happy to be reminded of.

Original: http://blog.minitab.com/blog/understanding-statistics/how-can-a-similar-p-value-mean-different-things

By: Eston Martz

Posted: May 5, 2017, 12:00 pm

Dummy user for scooping articles

I'm a dummy user created for scooping great articles in the network for the community.

- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- June 2007
- February 2007
- August 2005

innovation, Articles, Leadership, big data, Blogartikel, data management, Data Education, Education Resources For Use & Management of Data, innovation excellence, & Education, Data Daily | Data News, lean manufacturing, lean, Quality Insider Article, Twitter Ed, Six Sigma, systems thinking, Digitalisierung, lean six sigma, Business, Big Data News, Management Article, Management, Smart Data News, Lean Management, strategy, Gastbeiträge, The Latest, kaizen, Problem solving, continuous improvement, Soft Skills, Interviews, Operations Article, Change, Uncategorized, marketing, statistics, systems view of the world, Organization, Theory of Constraints, Immobilien, Personal, Culture, technology, Banken, Videos, quality, Sekretariat & Assistenz, agile